For that matter, what makes Dr. Cherry an expert and why should anyone listen to him?
The Council of Canadian Academies bio of him shows his impressive résumé and he is one of the foremost experts in his field. It shows he “holds geological engineering degrees from the University of Saskatchewan and University of California Berkley, and earned a PhD in geology with specialization in hydrogeology from the University of Illinois.”
He claims British Columbia has a law that fracking will not take place within 200 meters of residential dwellings, but they have recorded contamination leaking from hundreds of thousands of wells in Canada as far away as one mile. A new report from Penn State, shows contamination was discovered one to three kilometers (0.6 to 1.8 miles) from the source. Something like this would be devastating to the communities along the shoreline of the Cobequid Bay in Nova Scotia.
As it is, there is a moratorium on fracking in Nova Scotia. This doesn’t cover fracking for exploratory operations or research, just larger scale projects. It also doesn’t stop Jamie Baillie, Progressive Conservative MLA for Cumberland South, from hammering away at Premier Stephen McNeil on his stance. In a debate on April 30th, 2015, this exchange took place:
The honourable Leader of the Official Opposition.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask the Premier, why did he ban this new way of creating jobs when his own department doesn’t even know what he has done?
I want to thank the good people at Energy who work on behalf of all of us, Mr. Speaker, the exciting opportunities off the coast of Nova Scotia. We have seen major investments – BP and Shell – and those are all positive things to the province.
As the honourable member would know, the commission went around about fracking without providing any long-term solution on how we deal with the fracking waste in this province. As he knows, as all members of this House should, we have fracking waste existing in this province today that we can’t get rid of. We think it’s prudent on behalf of government, before we venture down that road of creating more of an environmental issue in this province, that we know how to deal with it.
Furthermore, Mr. Speaker, this government is continuing to move forward to work with the private sector, to consult with Nova Scotians, and I want to remind the honourable member that in this province there is a duty to consult with the First Nations and that has not happened to date.
Mr. Speaker, the Energy Department’s staff went to Alberta, B.C., New York State, and many other places. All they had to do was ask Phil Knoll of Halifax what he thought, and he would have said that a ban makes no sense – I’ll table that. As the Premier of a province so desperate for jobs, how can he possibly justify creating a ban on new ways to create jobs not even knowing what the ban actually is?
What our government has said, Mr. Speaker, is we will take the appropriate time and the time required to ensure that we protect the environment and we know how to deal with the fracking waste in this province if we’re to proceed. What we further said, before we proceed, we believe that issue should be brought back to the floor of the Legislature.
Mr. Speaker, the Premier is right about one thing: this province is full of opportunities but what it has is a government that bans some of the new ways of creating jobs instead of going about the hard work of finding a way to make it happen. For all this opportunity the fact remains that 18,400 rural Nova Scotians lost their jobs in the last four years. They want to see a government that finds a way forward, not putting roadblocks in their path. How can the people of Nova Scotia – those 18,400 – trust this government to promote jobs when they messed up the jobs in the film industry and they are banning a new one in onshore gas?
If you would like to view this discussion in its original context, you can click here.
Of particular interest in that dialogue is where the Premier says, “…we have fracking waste existing in this province today that we can’t get rid of. We think it’s prudent on behalf of government, before we venture down that road of creating more of an environmental issue in this province, that we know how to deal with it.”
The words “more of an environmental issue” go uncontested in the discussion so it’s clear both party leaders understand that it is an environmental issue. They haven’t denied it, but they may later.
Recent examples of environmental issues with fracking
- 42,800 gallons of fracking fluid spewing into the streets — Arlington Texas.
- Another Huge Fracking Mess! 200 Evacuated, Nearly 70 homes damaged in Albania
There won’t be any federal assistance for the citizens who oppose it. MP, Scott Armstrong said in an email two months ago, “Although the federal government develops the laws governing pollution, it is the province that administers the various Environmental Acts.” It’s clear to see that they will not over rule whatever is decided in this province. There isn’t much they could offer anyway. According to Dr. John Cherry, the federal government has little, to no scientific data or research of fracking. Although he stated there are 10’s of thousands of leaking wells in North America, it’s usually the companies that squelch complaints by buying out affected homes owners and making the victims sign non-disclosure agreements. In most cases this works well for the companies, except for the case of Jessica Ernst who filed a multi-million-dollar lawsuit against Alberta Environment and energy company Encana Corp. in 2007. She alleges fracking on her land northeast of Calgary released hazardous amounts of chemicals into her well and that her concerns were not properly investigated.
“The North American energy landscape is undergoing dramatic change. Unconventional oil and gas resources are fuelling an energy boom that is having profound economic, environmental, and social impacts across much of the continent, including Canada. At the forefront of this change is shale gas, which has been characterized as a “game changer” because it is abundant, often close to major markets, and relatively inexpensive to produce. Understanding potential impacts is critical for policy makers as they consider how best to manage this resource.
This report comes at the request of Environment Canada, which asked the Council to assemble a multidisciplinary expert panel to consider the state of knowledge of potential environmental impacts from the exploration, extraction, and development of Canada’s shale gas resources. The Council’s report presents a comprehensive examination of shale gas development in Canada. It does not, however, determine the safety, nor the economic benefits, of development. It reviews the use of new and conventional technologies in shale gas extraction, and examines several issues of concern including potential impacts on surface water and groundwater, greenhouse gas emissions, cumulative land disturbance, and human health. The report also outlines approaches for monitoring and research, as well as mitigation and management strategies.”
The report is available for free in pdf format. It’s 292 pages and goes into a lot of detail. The download is from the Council of Canadian Academies website and you can download it by clicking here.
If you were busy and didn’t get a chance to go to the meeting or watch it as it was live-streamed online you can watch the presentation below. There is quite a bit of echo at first; some of it gets cleared up a few minutes from the start. (Note: If you’re reading this post in an email message, you will have to click through to the website to see the video)
You can see why it’s important to maintain a moratorium on fracking in Nova Scotia. The science or lack of, could result in devastating consequences to Nova Scotia and it’s comforting to know that we are not alone. There is a website that keeps a list of all the bans on fracking worldwide. You can see it here.
Despite Premier Stephen McNeil’s insistence to maintain the moratorium for now, he’s keen on the outlook for LNG projects, which could be just as devastating if not more so. To learn more about it, please see Art MacKay’s report, LNG Accidents and Risks: A few things you need to know about your neighbourhood LNG terminal. It’s 266 pages, and will leave no question unanswered as to the safety of it. You can download it in pdf format or read it online here: http://bayoffundy.ca/archives/5073.
